Risk Matrix Scoring
Configure custom risk scoring matrices with adjustable dimensions, level cutoffs, and likelihood/impact definitions
Flow's risk matrix scoring system provides configurable risk assessment matrices that adapt to your organization's specific risk appetite and assessment methodology. Customize matrix dimensions, scoring thresholds, and level definitions to align with your governance framework.
Overview
Risk matrix scoring configuration includes:
- Adjustable Matrix Size - Choose from 3x3 up to 10x10 matrices
- Custom Level Cutoffs - Define score thresholds for Low, Medium, High, and Critical
- Likelihood Definitions - Customize likelihood scale descriptions
- Impact Definitions - Tailor impact scale descriptions to your context
- Inherent vs Residual Views - Toggle between pre-treatment and post-treatment scoring
Matrix Size Configuration
Available Sizes
| Size | Score Range | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| 3x3 | 1–9 | Simplified assessments, executive reporting |
| 4x4 | 1–16 | Balanced detail and simplicity |
| 5x5 | 1–25 | Industry standard, default setting |
| 6x6 | 1–36 | Detailed assessments with fine granularity |
| Up to 10x10 | 1–100 | Maximum granularity for complex environments |
The default configuration uses a 5x5 matrix with scores ranging from 1 to 25.
Changing Matrix Size
Navigate to Settings > Risk Matrix to adjust the matrix dimensions. Changing the matrix size recalculates all risk scores organization-wide to maintain consistency.
Risk Level Cutoffs
Default Thresholds (5x5 Matrix)
| Level | Score Range | Color | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 1–5 | Green | Acceptable risk, monitor periodically |
| Medium | 6–12 | Yellow | Moderate risk, requires management attention |
| High | 13–20 | Orange | Significant risk, requires active mitigation |
| Critical | 21–25 | Red | Unacceptable risk, immediate action required |
Custom Thresholds
Adjust level cutoffs to match your risk appetite. For example, a more conservative organization might set:
- Low: 1–3
- Medium: 4–8
- High: 9–15
- Critical: 16–25
Likelihood Scale
Default Definitions
| Level | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rare | Unlikely to occur in the next 10 years |
| 2 | Unlikely | May occur in the next 5 years |
| 3 | Possible | May occur in the next 2 years |
| 4 | Likely | May occur in the next year |
| 5 | Almost Certain | Expected to occur multiple times per year |
Customize these descriptions to reflect your organization's operational context and historical data.
Impact Scale
Default Definitions
| Level | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negligible | Minimal impact on operations |
| 2 | Minor | Some operational impact, easily managed |
| 3 | Moderate | Significant operational impact, requires management attention |
| 4 | Major | Severe operational impact, may affect business objectives |
| 5 | Catastrophic | Critical impact, threatens business continuity |
Score Calculation
Risk scores are calculated as:
Risk Score = Likelihood × Impact
This applies to both inherent and residual assessments:
- Inherent Score - Pre-treatment risk level based on raw likelihood and impact
- Residual Score - Post-treatment risk level after controls and mitigations are applied
Risk Matrix Visualization
The risk matrix report (Reports > Risk Matrix) renders your configured matrix as an interactive heatmap. Each cell shows the count of risks at that likelihood/impact intersection, color-coded by the configured level thresholds.
Display Modes
- Numbers - Show risk counts in each cell
- Circles - Visual dot representation proportional to risk count
View Modes
- Inherent - Display risks by their inherent (pre-treatment) scores
- Residual - Display risks by their residual (post-treatment) scores
Best Practices
- Align with Framework - Match your matrix configuration to your chosen risk framework (ISO 31000, COSO ERM)
- Consistent Definitions - Ensure likelihood and impact definitions are unambiguous and consistently applied
- Periodic Review - Review and recalibrate thresholds annually or when risk appetite changes
- Stakeholder Agreement - Get leadership buy-in on level definitions before rollout